This article has been viewed 3797 times and has 3 comments.
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released a report last month on the state of the U.S. economy [1]. The report warns that the U.S. is headed for a budget crisis unless it reforms healthcare spending. Without reform, the report forecasts that healthcare costs will consume approximately 20% of GDP by 2050:
“The major entitlement programmes – Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid – are the main reason that government finances are on an unsustainable course. Under current law, public spending on retirement and health programmes is expected to rise toward 20% of GDP by the middle of the century; resulting soaring budget deficits would entail a government debt twice the size of GDP at that time. Raising tax rates to finance such spending would be an expensive and inefficient solution. Entitlement reform is therefore essential to address this longer-term fiscal challenge. The problem facing Social Security is population ageing. As the post-World War II baby boomers retire while increases in life expectancy continue, the ratio of people receiving retirement benefits to the working-age population will rise steadily. Relatively limited changes to programme parameters would suffice to put the scheme on a solid financial footing, but it has been difficult to reach an agreement on the appropriate measures.”
With Baby Boomers starting to retire and the lack of new workers to replace them, the government will be collecting less tax revenue while paying increased Social Security and healthcare costs.
Indeed, the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a private, nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to promoting a greater understanding of how the economy works, wrote in a working paper almost two years ago [2]:
” … the U.S. may well be in the worst long-term fiscal shape of any OECD country even though it is now and will remain very young compared to the majority of its fellow OECD members.”
Established in 1961, the OECD brings together governments of countries committed to democracy and the market economy from around the world. Their focus is to support sustainable economic growth, boost employment, raise living standards, maintain financial stability, assist other countries’ economic development and contribute to growth in world trade. The OECD shares expertise and exchanges views with more than 70 other countries around the world and, for more than 40 years, has been one of the world’s largest and most reliable sources of comparable statistics as well as economic and social data.
The OECD report suggests several fixes, including:
- Reducing the high replacement rate of the workforce and tightening screening requirements for disability benefits to ensure that they do not encourage people to stop working unnecessarily.
- Raising the retirement age to not only discourage premature retirement but to make the Social Security system financially more secure.
- Restraining taxation and government spending.
- Expanding trade adjustment assistance programs (including wage insurance and health-care support) to include additional, if not all, dislocated workers, regardless of the cause of dislocation.
- Raising the earned income tax credit.
- Reinstatement of statutory caps on discretionary spending and pay-as-you-go requirements for increases in mandatory spending and tax cuts.
- Broadening of the tax base.
- Reducing or abolishing tax expenditures that are distorting, ill-targeted and ineffective.
- Shifting the tax burden from direct taxes to consumption-based indirect taxes – such as a national sales tax or a value-added tax.
- Higher taxation of carbon-based energy consumption.
The OECD further proposes limited changes to the Social Security program parameters with an acceleration of the already legislated increase in the normal retirement age and indexing benefits for rising longevity, a reduction in replacement rates for higher earners and an increase in the taxable maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security tax.
With regard to heathcare programs:
” … ways should be sought to improve efficiency in Medicare-related health delivery, so as to be able to limit payments to providers without affecting access to and quality of care. At the same time, premiums for higher-income beneficiaries could be raised further. Cost-conscious decisions would be encouraged by expanding individual health savings accounts and eliminating the tax bias towards high-cost insurance. The Administration has proposed to achieve the latter by replacing the unlimited tax exclusion of employer-furnished health insurance plan premiums by a tax deduction available to everyone. Arguably, a tax credit would have a greater effect on health insurance coverage.”
For those interested, a policy brief can be downloaded here.
I’ve written about this issue previously. Since September 2005, U.S. Comptroller General David Walker and both Democratic and Republican representatives have been touring the country as part of the Fiscal Wake-Up Tour, lobbying directly to taxpayers and opinion makers for extensive reform to both the Medicare program and the nation’s healthcare system.
This focus on healthcare costs and the U.S. budget is quite troubling. We’ve known for some time that as baby boomers age we’re going to run out of money to pay for the entitlements we’ve promised them. We are the American generation that truly promises enormous debt to those who follow - our children, our grandchildren and ourselves, many of us who will be in the midst of retirement.
Are you concerned?
Does the prospect of the U.S. government having no money available for anything beyond interest payments, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid in just over 30 years bother you?
How many voices need to echo these warnings before anything is done?
References
- Economic survey of the United States 2007. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2007 May 29.
- Christian Hagist and Laurence Kotlikoff. Who’s Going Broke? Comparing Growth in Healthcare Costs in Ten OECD Countries. The National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 11833. 2005 Dec.
Share on Facebook
Add to Connotea
add to delicious












The FairTax would be such a consumption-based tax system. Here is why the FairTax will make a good U.S. tax system REPLACEMENT. It’s:
• SIMPLE, easy to understand
• EFFICIENT, inexpensive to comply with and doesn’t cause less-than-optimal business decisions for tax minimization purposes
• FAIR, loophole free and everyone pays their share
• LOW TAX RATE, achieved by broad base with no exclusions
• PREDICTABLE, doesn’t change, so financial planning is possible
• UNINTRUSIVE, doesn’t intrude into our personal affairs or limit our liberty
• VISIBLE, not hidden from the public in tax-inflated prices or otherwise
• PRODUCTIVE, rewards, rather than penalizes, work and productivity
Its benefits are as follows:
FOR INDIVIDUALS:
• No more tax on income - make as much as you wish
• You receive your full paycheck - no more deductions
• You pay the tax when you buy “at retail” - not “used”
• No more double taxation (e.g. like on current Capital Gains)
• Reduction of “pre-FairTaxed” retail prices by 20%-30%
• Adding back 29.9% FairTax maintains current price levels
• FairTax would constitute 23% portion of new prices
• Every household receives a monthly check, or “pre-bate”
• Pre-bate equals payback for taxes on spending to poverty level
• FairTax’s pre-bate ensures progressivity, poverty protection
• Finally, citizens are knowledgeable of what their tax IS
• Elimination of “parasitic” Income Tax industry
• NO MORE IRS. NO MORE FILING OF TAX RETURNS by individuals
• Those possessing illicit forms of income will ALSO pay the FairTax
• Households have more disposable income to purchase goods
• Savings is bolstered with reduction of interest rates
FOR BUSINESSES:
• Corporate income and payroll taxes revoked under FairTax
• Business compensated for collecting tax at “cash register”
• No more tax-related lawyers, lobbyists on company payrolls
• No more embedded (hidden) income/payroll taxes in prices
• Reduced costs. Competition - not tax policy - drives prices
• Off-shore “tax haven” headquarters can now return to U.S
• No more “favors” from politicians at expense of taxpayers
• Resources go to R&D and study of competition - not taxes
• Marketplace distortions eliminated for fair competition
• US exports increase their share of foreign markets
FOR THE COUNTRY:
• 7% - 13% economic growth projected in the first year of the FairTax
• Jobs return to the U.S.
• Foreign corporations “set up shop” in the U.S.
• Tax system trends are corrected to “enlarge the pie”
• Larger economic “pie,” means thinner tax rate “slices”
• Initial 23% portion of price is pressured downward as “pie”
increases
• No more “closed door” tax deals by politicians and business
• FairTax sets new global standard. Other countries will follow
Very interesting. Thanks for the information Ian.
For those wishing to read more:
FairTax.org
FairTax Foundation - benefits of the FairTax
FairTax on Wikipedia
US Representative John Linder, sponsor of the FairTax Act of 2003
[...] people achieve, maintain or regain good health. We are getting sicker and sicker as we continue to spend more on [...]